← Blog

Why would Maersk sail around an entire continent?

By FreightStow

On a map, sending a ship around southern Africa instead of through Suez looks like taking the longest possible way home. For a shipping line, the decision can be about whether the shorter route is safe to use at all.

A Maersk customer advisory dated 1 March 2026 provides a concrete example. The company said it was pausing future Trans-Suez sailings through Bab el-Mandeb and rerouting its ME11 and MECL services around the Cape of Good Hope, citing the regional security situation.

This is a look at that documented decision. It is not a live statement about every Maersk service's route today.

The shortcut and the detour

The advisory identifies ME11 as Middle East–India to Mediterranean and MECL as Middle East–India to US East Coast. For those services, the Cape alternative changes the passage between the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic side of the route.

Two schematic routes between India and the MediterraneanThe Suez route crosses Bab el-Mandeb and the Suez Canal. The alternative passes the Cape of Good Hope and approaches the Mediterranean from the Atlantic. This is not a geographic map or a distance scale.IndiaRed Sea / SuezMediterraneanCape of Good HopeAtlantic
Schematic only, not a map or distance measurement. Actual service rotations include additional port calls.

The diagram explains the choice without pretending that all ships call at the same ports. A vessel's actual itinerary, sailing speed, port calls and waiting time determine the schedule.

Maersk's notice said it would prioritize the Trans-Suez route again when conditions permitted. In other words, the company was not claiming the longer route had suddenly become a faster shortcut.

Why the effect is bigger than one late ship

Here is a simplified scheduling example, not a Maersk operating figure. Suppose a weekly service needs eight ships to cover an eight-week round trip. If its round trip becomes ten weeks, maintaining the same weekly pattern requires ten ships under those assumptions.

With the same eight ships, something else has to change. A line might change a rotation, alter frequency or find more equipment and vessel capacity. A delay is therefore also a fleet-planning problem.

For a buyer, an unchanged arrival date is the assumption to question first. The next questions concern connections, warehouse bookings and how much inventory is available before the replacement cargo arrives.

Why we are not publishing one universal “extra days” number

A detour does not add the same number of days to every origin–destination pair. Nor does a vessel's extra sailing distance directly establish a customer's final delivery delay.

A useful comparison needs a specific booking or service rotation, dated schedules before and after the change, and the same start and end points. Quoting an old regional average as the current delay for your shipment would hide those differences.

What to ask about an affected shipment

Ask for the revised vessel and voyage, the confirmed routing, the updated arrival estimate and any affected connection. Keep the answer with the booking record. A broad advisory explains why a network changed; it is not a substitute for the details of your container.

For a different schedule problem, read what happens when a container misses its booked sailing. Sources and the historical advisory were checked on 28 October 2026.